The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology :eISSN 2233-6869 / pISSN 1598-9992

 

Table. 1.

Comparision of PTBD and ERCP for Advanced Malignant Hilar Obstruction

PTBD ERCP
Pros Well-tailored method
Higher technical and clinical success as a primary or rescue technique
Possible selective lobar selecion
Well-establised method
Primary clinical and long term data available
Comfortable for the patients
Cons Impaired quality of life
Relatively high adverse events
Complexity in high-grade strictures
Difficult revision in multiple metal stents

PTBD, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Korean J Gastroenterol 2021;78:94~104 https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2021.111
© Korean J Gastroenterol